Legitymizacja przedsiębiorczości społecznej: izomorfizm refleksyjny w stadium preparadygmatu
The Legitimacy of Social Entrepreneurship: Reflexive Isomorphism in a Pre-Paradigmatic Field

do pobrania/download PDF

Nicholls Alex (tł. Robert Chrabąszcz)

Said Business School, University of Oxford
Park End Street; Oxford; OX1 1 HP
e-mail: Alex.Nicholls(at)sbs.ox.ac.uk


Abbott A. [1988], The system of professions, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Aiken M. [2006], Towards market or state? Tensions and opportunities in the evolutionary path of three types of UK Social Enterprise, [w:] M. Nyssens (red.), Towards market or state? Tensions and opportunities in the evolutionary path of three UK social enterprises (s. 259-271), London: Routledge.
Aldrich H., Baker T. [1997], Blinded by the cities? Has there been progress in entrepreneurship research? [w:] D. Sexton, R. Smilor (red.), Entrepreneurship 2000 (s. 377-400), Chicago: Upstart Publishing.
Aldrich H., Fiol C. [1994], Fools rush in? The institutional context of industry creation, “Academy of Management Review”, 19, 645–670.
Alter K. [2006], A social enterprise typology, dostępne na: www.virtueventures.com/typology.php (4 lutego).
Alvord S., Brown L., Letts C. [2004], Social entrepreneurship and societal transformation: An exploratory study, “Journal of Applied Behavioral Science”, 40 (3), 260-283.
Ashforth B., Gibbs B. [1990], The double edge of organizational legitimation, “Organization Science”, 1, 177–194.
Austin J., Gutierrez R., Ogliastri, E. [2006], Effective management of social enterprises: Lessons from business and civil society organizations in Ibero-America, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
Barnes M. [1999], Users as citizens: Collective action and the local governance of welfare, “Social Policy and Administration”, 33 (1), 73-90.
Battle Anderson B., Dees J.G. [2006], Rhetoric, reality, and research: Building a solid foundation for the practice of social entrepreneurship, [w:] A. Nicholls (red.), Social entrepreneurship: New paradigms of ustainable social change (s. 144-168), Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Baum J., Powell W. [1995], Cultivating an institutional ecology of organizations: Comment on Hannan, Carroll, Dundon, and Torres, “American Sociological Review”, 60, 529-538.
Blair T. [2006], OTS (Offi ce of the Third Sector) (2006), Social enterprise action plan: Scaling new heights, London: Cabinet Office.
Bornstein D. [2004], How to change the world: Social entrepreneurs and the power of new ideas. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Borzaga C., Defourny J. [2001], The emergence of social enterprise, New York: Routledge.
Bourdieu P. [1993], The field of cultural production: Essays on art and literature, Cambridge: Polity Press.
Bovaird T. [2006], Developing new relationships with the market” in the procurement of public services, “Public Administration”, 84 (1), 81-102.
Busenitz L., Page West G., Shepherd D., Nelson T., Chandler G., Zacharakis A. [2003], Entrepreneurship research in emergence: Past trends and future directions, “Journal of Management”, 29 (3), 285-308.
Carter S., Deephouse D. [1999], “Tough talk” or “soothing speech”: Managing reputations for being tough and being good, “Corporate Reputation Review”, 2, 308-332.
Clotfelter C. (red.) [1992], Who benefits from the nonprofit sector?, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Corner P., Ho M. [2010], How opportunities develop in social entrepreneurship, “Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice”,34 (4), 635-659.
Dart R. [2004], The legitimacy of social enterprise, “Nonprofit Management and Leadership”, 14 (4), 411-424.
Davis G., McAdam D., Scott W., Zald M. [2005], Social movements and organization theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Deephouse D. [1996], Does isomorphism legitimate?, “Academy of Management Journal”, 39 (4), 1024-1039.
Deephouse D., Suchman M. [2008], Legitimacy in organizational institutionalism, [w:] R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, R. Suddaby (red.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (s. 49-77), London: Sage.
Di Domenico M., Haugh H., Tracy P. [2010], Social bricolage: Theorizing social value creation in social enterprise, “Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice”, 34 (4), 681-703.
DiMaggio P., Powell W. [1983], The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields, “American Sociological Review”, 48, 147-160.
DiMaggio P., Powell W. [1991], Introduction, [w:] P. DiMaggio, W. Powell (red.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (s. 1-40), Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Dowling J., Pfeffer J. [1975], Organizational legitimacy: Social values and organizational behavior, “Pacific Sociological Review”, 18, 122-136.
Edwards M. [2008], Just another emperor? The myths and realities of philanthrocapitalism, London: The Young Foundation/Demos.
Edwards M. [2010], Small change: Why business won’t save the world, San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.
Elkington J., Hartigan P. [2008], The power of unreasonable people, Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Elsbach K. [1994], Managing organizational legitimacy in the California cattle industry: The construction and effectiveness of verbal accounts, “Administrative Science Quarterly”, 39, 57-88.
Elsbach K., Sutton R. [1992], Acquiring organizational legitimacy through illegitimate actions: Amarriage of institutional and impression management theories, “Academy of Management Journal”, 35, 699-738.
Evers A., Laville J.-L. [2004], The third sector in Europe, London: Edward Elgar.
Friedland R., Alford R. [1991], Bringing society back in: Symbols, practices and institutional contradictions, [w:] P. DiMaggio, W. Powell (red.), The new institutionalism inorganizational analysis (s. 232-263), Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Galaskiewicz J. [1985], Interorganizational relations, “Annual Review of Sociology”, 11, 281–304.
Giddens A. [1984], The constitution of society, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Giddens A. [1998], The third way, Cambridge: Polity Press.
Giddens A. [2000], The third way and its critics, Cambridge: Polity Press.
Grenier P. [2006], Social entrepreneurship: Agency in a globalizing world, [w:] A. Nicholls (red.), Social entrepreneurship: New paradigms of sustainable social change (s. 119-143), Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Grimes M. [2010], Strategic sense making within funding relationships: The effects of performance measurement on organizational identity in the social sector, “Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice”, 34 (4), 763-783.
Hargens L. [1988], Scholarly consensus and journal rejection rates, “American Sociological Review”, 53, 139-151.
Hargrave T., Van der Ven A. [2006], A collective action model of institutional innovation, “Academy of Management Review”, 31 (4), 864-888.
Harrison R., Leitch C. [1996], Discipline emergence in entrepreneurship: Accumulative fragmentalism or paradigmatic science, “Entrepreneurship, Innovation and Change”, 5 (2), 65-83.
Hybels R. [1995], On legitimacy, legitimation, and organizations:A critical review and integrative theoretical model, Best Paper Proceedings of the Academy of Management, 241-245.
Kaplan S. [2008], Framing contests: Strategy making under uncertainty, “Organization Science”, 19, 729-752.
Kistruck G., Beamish P. [2010], The interplay of form, structure, and embeddedness in social intrapreneurship,“Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice”, 34 (4), 735-761.
Kuhn T. [1962], The structure of scientific revolutions, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Leadbeater C. [1997], The rise of the social entrepreneur, London: Demos.
LeGrand J. [2003], Motivation, agency, and public policy.Of knights and knaves, pawns and ąueens, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
LeGrand J., Bartlett W. (red.). [1993], Quasi-markets and social policy. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Light P. [2006], Reshaping social entrepreneurship, “Stanford Social Innovation Review” (Autumn) 47-51.
Light P. [2008], The search for social entrepreneurship, Washington, DC: Brookings.
Lodahl J., Gordon G. [1972], The structure of scientific fields and the functioning of university graduate departments,“American Sociological Review”, 37, 57-72.
Lodahl J., Gordon G. [1973], Differences between physical and social sciences in university graduate departments,“Research in Higher Education”, 1, 191-213.
Lounsbury M. [2007], A tale of two cities: Competing logics and practice variation in the professionalizing of mutual funds “Academy of Management Journal”, 50, 289-330.
Lounsbury M., Glynn M. A. [2001], Cultural entrepreneurship: Stories, legitimacy, and the acquisition of resources, “Strategic Management Journal”, 22, 545-564.
Lounsbury M., Strang D. [2009], Social entrepreneurship. Success stories and logic construction, [w:] D. Hammack, S. Heydemann (red.), Globalization, philanthropy, and civil society (s. 71-94), Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Lukes S. [1974], Power: A radical view, London: Macmillan.
Maturana H., Varela F. [1973], Autopoiesis and cognition: The realization of the living, Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Meyer J., Rowan B. [1977], Institutionalised organisations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony, “American Journal of Sociology”, 83, 340-363.
Meyer J., Scott W. [1983], Centralization and the legitimacy problems of local government, [w:] J.W. Meyer, W.R. Scott (red.), Organizational environments: Ritual and rationality (s. 199-215), London: Sage.
Meyer J., Scott R., Cole S., Intili J. [1978], Instructional dissensus and institutional consensus in schools, [w:] M. Meyer (red.), Environments and organizations (s. 290-305), San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Meyer J., Scott R., Deal T. [1981], Institutional and technical sources of organizational structure: Explaining the structure of organizations, [w:] H. Stein (red.), Organization and the human services (s. 151–178), Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
Meyskens M., Robb-Post C., Stamp J., Carsrud A., Reynolds P. [2010], Social ventures from a resource-based perspective: An exploratory study assessing global Ashoka fellows, “Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice”, 34 (4), 661-680.
Miller T., Wesley C. [2010], Assessing mission and resources for social change: An organizational identity perspective on social venture capitalists’ decision criteria, “Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice”, 34 (4), 705-733.
Morgan G. [2006], Images of organization. London: Sage.
Mulgan G. [2007], Social innovation. Skoll Centre for Social Entrepreneurship, dostępne na: www.sbs.ox.ac.uk/skoll/research/Short+papers/Short+papers.htm (4 lutego).
NCVO [2008], UK voluntary sector almanac 2007, London: National Council of Voluntary Organizations.
Nicholls A. [2006a], Playing the field: A new approach to the meaning of social entrepreneurship, “Social Enterprise Journal”, 2 (1), 1-5.
Nicholls A. [2006b], Introduction: The meanings of social entrepreneurship, [w:] A. Nicholls (red.), Social entre preneurship: New paradigms of sustainable social change (s. 1-36), Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Nicholls A. [2008], Capturing the performance of the Socially Entrepreneurial Organisation (SEO): An organisational legitimacy approach, [w:] J. Robinson, J. Mair, K. Hockerts (red.), International perspectives on social entrepreneurship research, London: Palgrave Macmillan. (forthcoming).
Nicholls A. [2009], Learning to walk: Social entrepreneurship, Innovations: Special Edition Skoll World Forum, s. 209-222.
Nicholls A. [2010a], What gives fair trade its right to operate? Organisational legitimacy and the strategic management of social entrepreneurship, [w:] K. Macdonald, S. Marshall (red.), Fair trade corporate accountability and beyond: Experiments in global justice governance mechanisms (s. 95-121), London: Ashgate.
Nicholls A. [2010b], Institutionalizing social entrepreneurship in regulatory space: Reporting and disclosure by community interest companies, “Accounting, Organizations and Society”, 35, 394-415.
Nicholls A. [2010c], The institutionalization of social investment: The interplay of investment logics and kwestor rationalities, “Journal of Social Entrepreneurship”, 1 (1), 70-100.
Nicholls A., Cho A. [2006], Social entrepreneurship: The structuration of a field, [w:] A. Nicholls (red.), Social entrepreneurship: New paradigms of sustainable social change (s. 99–118), Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Nicholls A., Pharoah C. [2007], The landscape of social finance. Oxford: Skoll Centre for Social Entrepreneurship, dostępne na: www.sbs.ox.ac.uk/centres/skoll/research/Pages/socialfinance.aspx (4 lutego).
Nicholls A., Young R. [2008], Introduction: The changing landscape of social entrepreneurship, [w:] A. Nicholls (red.), Social entrepreneurship: New paradigms of sustainable social change (Paperback ed., s. vii–xxiii),Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Nyssens M. (red.). [2006], Social enterprise, London: Routledge.
Oliver C. [1997], Sustainable competitive advantage: Combining institutional and resource-based views, “Strategic Management Journal”, 18, 697-713.
Osberg S., Martin R. [2007], Social entrepreneurship: The case for defi nition, “Stanford Social Innovation Review”, Spring, 28-39.
Osbourne D., Gaebler T. [1992], Reinventing government, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
OTS [2006], OTS (Office of the Third Sector), Cabinet Office, Social enterprise action plan: Scaling new heights, London: Office of The Third Sector.
Peredo A., McLean M. [2006], Social entrepreneurship: A ritical review of the concept, “Journal of World Business”, 41, 56-65.
Perrini F. (red.) [2006], The new social entrepreneurship: What awaits social entrepreneurship ventures?, Cheltenham, U.K.: Edward Elgar.
Pfeffer J. [1993], Barriers to the advance of organizational science: Paradigm development as a dependent variable, “Academy of Management Review”, 18 (4), 599-620.
Pfeffer J., Moore, W. [1980], Power in university budgeting: A replication and extension, “Administrative Science Quarterly”, 25, 637-653.
Pfeffer J., Salancik G. [1978], The external control of organizations: A resource dependency perspective, New York: Harper Row.
Phillips N., Lawrence T., Hardy C. [2004], Discourse and institutions,Academy of Management Review”, 29, 635-652.
Prahalad C. K. [2005], The fortune at the bottom of the pyramid: Eradicating poverty through profit, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, Wharton School Publishing.
Rao H. [1994], The social construction of reputation: Certification contests, legitimation, and the survival of organizations in the American automobile industry 1895-1912, “Strategic Management Journal”, 15, 29-44.
Roth G., Wittich C. (red.) [1978], Economy and society, San Francisco: University of California Press.
Ruef M., Scott W. [1998], A multidimensional model of organizational legitimacy: Hospital survival in changing institutional environments, “Administrative Science Quarterly”,43, 877-904.
Salamon L., Anheier H. [1999], The emerging sector revisited. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University.
Salamon L., Anheier H., List R., Toepler S., Sokolowski S. (red.) [2003], Global civil society: Dimensions of the nonprofit sector, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University.
Scott W.R. [1995], Institutions and organizations, San Francisco, CA: Sage.
Shaw E., Carter S. [2007], Social entrepreneurship; theoretical antecedents and empirical analysis of entrepreneurial processes and outcomes, “Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development”, 14 (3), 418–429.
Short J., Moss T., Lumpkin G. [2009], Research in social entrepreneurship: Past contributions and future opportunities, “Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal”, 3, 161-194.
Singh, J., Tucker, D., House R. [1986], Organizational legitimacy and the liability of newness, “Administrative Science Quarterly”, 31, 171-193.
Social Enterprise Unit [2002], Social enterprise: A strategy for success, London: Department for Trade and Industry.
Stryker R. [2000], Legitimacy processes as institutional politics: Implications for theory and research in the sociology of organizations, “Research in the Sociology of Organizations”, 17, 179-223.
Suchman M. [1995], Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches, “Academy of Management Review” 20, 517-610.
Suddaby, R., Greenwood, R. [2005], Rhetorical strategies of legitimacy, “Administrative Science Quarterly”, 50, 35-67.
Sullivan Mort G., Weerawardena J., Carnegie K. [2003], Social entrepreneurship: Towards conceptualisation, “International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing”, 8 (1), 76-88.
Vaara E.,Tienari J., Laurila J. [2006], Pulp and paper fiction: On the discursive legitimation of global industrial restructuring, “Organization Studies”, 27, 789-810.
Walsh K. [1995], Public services and market mechanisms. Competition, contracting, and the new public management, London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Weerawardena J., Sullivan Mort G. [2006], Investigating social entrepreneurship: A multidimensional model, “Journal of World Business”, 41, 21-35.
Yoels W. [1974], The structure of scientific fields and the allocation of editorships on scientific journals: Some observations on the politics of knowledge, “Sociological Quarterly”, 15, 264-276.
Yunus M. [2008], Creating a world without poverty: Social business and the future of capitalism, New York: Public Affairs.
Zimmerman M., Zeitz G. [2002], Beyond survival: Achieving new venture growth by building legitimacy, “Academy of Management Review”, 27 (3), 414-431.
Zucker L. [1977], The role of institutionalization in cultural persistence, “American Journal of Sociology”, 42, 726-743.


Nicholls A. [2013], Legitymizacja przedsiębiorczości społecznej: izomorfizm refleksyjny w stadium preparadygmatu, "Ekonomia Społeczna", nr 1, s. 101-117.