Neoliberalizm nieograniczający i ekonomia społeczna
Roll-out Neoliberalism and the Social Economy

do pobrania/download PDF

Peter Graefe (tłumaczenie: Rafał Śmietana)


Acker J. [2004], Gender, Capitalism and Globalization, „Critical Sociology”, Vol. 30, No. 1.
Albo G. [2004], Contesting the ‘New Capitalism’, Department of Political Science, York University (mimeo).
Albo G., Fast T. [2003], Varieties of Neoliberalism: Trajectories of Workfare in the Advanced Capitalist Countries, Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Canadian Political Science Association, Halifax.
Amin A., Cameron A., Hudson R. [1999], Welfare as Work? The Potential of the UK Social Economy, „Environment and Planning A”, Vol. 31, No. 11.
Amin A., Cameron A., Hudson R. [2002], Placing the Social Economy, Routledge, London.
Ascoli U., Ranci C. [2002], Changes in the Welfare Mix: The European Path, [w:] U. Ascoli, C. Ranci (red.), Dilemmas of the Welfare Mix: The New Structure of Welfare in an Era of Privatization, Kluwer Academic, New York.
Association [1998], Who Will Be Responsible for Providing Care? The Impact of the Shift to Ambulatory Care and of Social Economy Policies on Quebec Women, Status of Women Canada, Association feminine d’éducation et d’action sociale, Ottawa.
Baines D. [2004], Pro-market, Non-market: The Dual Nature of Organizational Change in Social Service Delivery, „Critical Social Policy”, Vol. 24, No. 1.
Bernier N. F. [2003], How Health Care Reform Impacts Social Policy and Social Redistribution, „Canadian Review of Social Policy”, No. 53.
Borzaga C., Santuari A. [2003], New Trends in the Non-profit Sector in Europe: The Emergence of Social Entrepreneurship, [w:] The Non-profit Sector in a Changing Economy, OECD, Paris.
Bucek J., Smith B. [2000], New Approaches to Local Democracy: Direct Democracy, Participation and the “Third Sector”, „Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy”, Vol. 18, No. 1.
Carroll W. K., Carson C. [2003], Forging a New Hegemony? The Role of Transnational Policy Groups in the Network and Discourses of Global Corporate Governance, „Journal of World-Systems Research”, Vol. 9, No. 1.
Chagnon J. [2004], Portrait 2003 des enterprises en aide domestique, Ministère du Développement économique et régional et de la Recherche, Québec.
Comeau Y. i in. [2003], L’économie sociale et le Sommet socioéconomique de 1996: Le bilan des acteurs sur le terrain, „Nouvelles pratiques socials”, Vol. 15, No. 2.
Comeau Y., Favreau L., Lévesque B., Mendell M. [2001], Emploi, économie sociale, développement local: Les nouvelles filières, Presses de l’Université du Québec, Sainte-Foy.
Craig G., Taylor M. [2002], Dangerous Liaisons: Local Government and the Voluntary and Community Sectors, [w:] C. Glendinning, M. Powell, K. Rummery (red.), Partnership, New Labour and the Governance of Welfare, Polity Press, Bristol.
D’Amours M. [2001], Économie sociale au Québec: Vers un clivage entre entreprise collective et action communautaire, Projet de coopération France-Québec en économie sociale et solidaire, May (’Amours.pdf ).
Daly M., Yeates N. [2002], Common Origins, Diff erent Paths: Adaptation and Change in Social Security in Britain and Ireland, „Policy & Politics”, Vol. 31, No. 1.
Eisenschitz A., Gough J. [1996], The Contradictions of Neo-Keynesian Local Economic Strategy, „Review of International Political Economy”, Vol. 3, No. 3.
Esping-Andersen G. [2002], Towards the Good Society, Once Again?, [w:] Why We Need a New Welfare State, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
European Commission [1998], The Era of Tailor-made Jobs: Second Report on Local Development and Employment Initiatives, European Commission, Brussels.
Evers A., Laville J.-L. [2004], Social Services by Social Enterprises: On the Possible Constribution of Hybrid Organizations and a Civil Society, [w:] A. Evers, J.-L. Laville (red.) The Third Sector in Europe, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
Gough J. [2004], Changing Scale as Changing Class Relations: Variety and Contradiction in the Politics of Scale, „Political Geography”, Vol. 23, No. 2.
Groupe [1996], Groupe de travail sur l’économie sociale, Osons la solidarité, October.
Hudson R. [2002], New Geographies and Forms of Work and Unemployment and Public Policy Innovation in Europe, „Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografi e”, Vol. 93, No. 3.
Jenson J. [2002], Against the Current: Child Care and Family Policy in Quebec, [w:] S. Michel, R. Mahon (red.) Child Care Policy at the Crossroads: Gender and Welfare State Restructuring, Routledge, New York.
Jenson J., Saint-Martin D. [2003], New Routes to Social Cohesion? Citizenship and the Social Investment State, „Canadian Journal of Sociology”, Vol. 28, No. 1.
Jessop B. [2002], Liberalism, Neoliberalism, and Urban Governance: A State-Theoretical Perspective, „Antipode”, Vol. 34, No. 3.
Larner W. [2000], Neo-liberalism: Policy, Ideology, Governmentality, „Studies in Political Economy”, No. 63.
Laville J.-L. [2003], A New European Socioeconomic Perspective, „Review of Social Economy”, Vol. 61, No. 3.
Lévesque B., Malo M.-C., Tremblay D. [2001], Partenariat économie sociale et économie publique, „Économie et solidarities”, Vol. 32, No. 1-2.
McDonald C., Marston G. [2002], Patterns of Governance: The Curious Case of Non-profit Community Services in Australia, „Social Policy and Administration”, Vol. 36, No. 4.
Ministère [1998], Québec objectif emploi: Vers une économie d’avant-garde: Une stratégie de développement économique créatrice d’emplois, Ministère des Finances [2003], Vers le plein emploi – Volet économie sociale, Ministère des Finances, Québec.
Ministère du Développement [2005], Plan stratégique 2005-2008, MDEIE, Québec.
Murphy C. N. [1999], Inequality, Turmoil and Democracy: Global Political-Economic Visions at the End of the Century, „New Political Economy”, Vol. 4, No. 2.
McMurtry J. J. [2004], Social Economy as Political Practice, „International Journal of Social Economics”, Vol. 31, No. 9.
OECD [1998], Fostering Entrepreneurship, OECD, Paris.
OECD [1999], Social Enterprises, OECD, Paris.
Peck J. [2002], Political Economies of Scale: Fast Policy, Interscalar Relations and Neoliberal Workfare, „Economic Geography”, Vol. 78, No. 3.
Peck J. [2004], Geography and Public Policy: Constructions of Neoliberalism, „Progress in Human Geography”, Vol. 28, No. 3.
Peck J., Tickell A. [2002], Neoliberalizing Space, „Antipode”, Vol. 34, No. 3.
Regroupement [1998], Leur équilibre, notre déséquilibre, RIOCM, Regroupement intersectoriel des organismes communautaires de Montréal, Montréal.
René J.-F. i in. [2001], Les organisms communautaires au Québec: Des pratiques à la croisée des chemins, Relais-femmes, Montréal.
Saint-Martin D. [2001], De l’état-providence à l’état d’investissement social: un nouveau paradigme pour enfanter l’économie du savoir?, [w:] L. Pal (red.) How Ottawa Spends 2000-2001, Oxford University Press, Toronto.
Shragge E. [1999], Looking Backwards to Go Forward: The Quebec Community Movement 30 Years Later, „Intervention”, No. 110.
Taylor M. [2003], Public Policy in the Community, Palgrave MacMillan, New York.
Tickell A., Peck J. [2003], Making Global Rules: Globalization or Neoliberalization?, [w:] J. Peck, H. Wai-chung Yeung (red.) Remaking the Global Economy: Economic-Geographic Perspectives, Sage, London.
Torfing J. [1999], Towards a Schumpeterian Workfare Postnational Regime: Path-Shaping and Path-Dependency in Danish Welfare State Reform, „Economy and Society”, Vol. 28, No. 3.
Uitermark J. [2005], The Genesis and Evolution of Urban Policy: A Confrontation of Regulationist and Governmentality Approaches, „Political Geography”, Vol. 24, No. 2.
White D. [2001], Formalizing Relations Between States and Voluntary Sectors: A Comparison of National Partnership Agreements, Paper presented at the RC19 meeting of the ISA, Oviedo, Spain, September.
White D. [2004], The Voluntary Sector, Community Sector and Social Economy in Canada: Why One is not the Other, [w:] A. Zimmer, Ch. Stecker (red.) Strategy Mix for Nonprofit Organisations: Vehicles for Social and Labour Market Integrations, Kluwer Academic, New York.


Graefe P. [2012], Neoliberalizm nieograniczający i ekonomia społeczna, „Ekonomia Społeczna”, nr 1, s. 101-115.